From NANO to MWCNT

A question of size and not of material/composition

Many countries and organizations have developed working definitions to identify nanomaterials based on the size of the material, its novel properties, or a combination of both. In fact, each material “exists” at the nanoscale. Materials at nanoscale behave differently than those at macroscale. Nanoparticles present incredible properties based on “quantum effects” and other simple physical effects such as expanded surface area. In summary, “nano” is just a question of size and not of material or composition.

Read more Read less

Nanoscience and nanotechnology are the study and application of extremely small things and can be used across all the other science fields, such as chemistry, biology, physics, materials science, and engineering. In the International System of Units, the prefix “nano” means one billionth, (or 10-9) of a meter. The Figure 1 illustrates clearly the nanoscale.

hse-1-nano-scale

Figure 1. The « Nano » scale.

Nanoparticles are abundant in nature, as they are produced in many natural processes, including photochemical reactions, volcanic eruptions, forest fires, simple erosion and by plants and animals. Any groups of atoms or molecules present in nature have a “nano” size such as amino acids, proteins, DNA, viruses, etc. Those are organic molecules with carbon atoms, hydrogen atoms and oxygen atoms mainly.

In fact, each material “exists” at the nanoscale. During a long time, humans have not been able to produce with a sufficient control material at nanoscale such as nature is doing since millions of years. Other sources of nanoparticles can be identified and originates from the man-made activity such as incidental nanoparticles generated as unwanted by-products from combustion processes (e.g.: charcoal burning, incinerators,…).

Materials at nanoscale behave differently than at macroscale and nanoparticles often presents incredible properties based on “quantum effects” and other simple physical effects such as expanded surface area. The integration of the nanoparticles inside a matrix leads to improve specific properties depending on the nature of the nanoparticles and the matrix in which the nanoparticles are integrated (polycarbonates, polystyrene, polyethylene, natural rubber, polyurethane, epoxies, etc.). Each type of nanoparticle will improve a different set of properties (electrical, mechanical, thermal, etc.).

hse-2-sources-of-nanoparticles

Figure 2. Sources of nanoparticles.

In summary, “nano” is just a question of size and not of material or composition.

The definition of a nanomaterial does not make the consensus yet. In 2011, the European Commission adopted a recommendation on the definition of a nanomaterial in 3 steps [COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 18 October 2011 on the definition of nanomaterial(Text with EEA relevance) (2011/696/EU)]:

  • a natural, incidental or manufactured material
  • That contains particles, in an unbound state or as an aggregate or as an agglomerate
  • and where, for 50% or more of the particles in the number size distribution, one or more external dimensions is in the size range 1 nm – 100 nm.”

It is finally quite recently that humans have developed techniques for manufacturing nanoparticles in a controllable and reproducible way; what are called today engineered nanoparticles (“ENP”).

Figure 3 illustrates that nanoparticles look very different. Spheres, rods, fibers, stars, cups,… are various shapes that have been identified.

hse-3-different-material-shapes-at-the-nanoscale

Figure 3. Different material shapes at the nanoscale. From left to right: spherical gold nanoparticles, carbon blacks agglomerates, silicone oxide stars, nanofibrils of cellulose.

Diversity of structures of carbon allotropes

Various carbon structures exist at the nanoscale with different properties and costs. 3D carbon atoms layout could lead to various structures such as diamond, graphite (several hundreds of layers of graphenes), carbon blacks, tubular carbon nanotubes, graphene layer (1D material), fullerene (ball structure), carbon fibers etc.

Read more Read less

The Figure 4 presents different carbon materials at the nanoscale. Those materials are only composed of carbon atoms but their primary structure is very different.

3D carbon atoms layout could lead to various structures such as nanodiamond, graphite (several hundreds of layers of graphene), carbon blacks, tubular carbon nanotubes, graphene layer (1D material), fullerene, carbon fibers etc.

  • Nanodiamond
    Nanodiamond
  • Fullerene C60
    Fullerene C60
  • SWNT
    SWNT
  • MWNT
    MWNT
  • Graphene
    Graphene

Figure 4. Main carbon allotropes.
Source: “Environmental Applications of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials”, Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 5843 (2008)

Those primary structures represent the different possibilities of perfect carbon atoms layout. In reality, carbon allotropes contain defects and agglomerates of carbon allotropes slighty differ from their primary structure. Carbon black agglomerates have various complex and stochastic 3D structures. NC7000™ multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) agglomerates have a spaghetti-like structure.

Diversity of multiwall carbon nanotube structures

Depending on the manufacturing parameters and processes, a large variety of multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) structures can be produced. Those structures differ in term of size/shape, surface chemistry or purity levels.
In conclusion, multiwall carbon nanotubes toxicological profiles (hazard) have to be assessed on case by case basis. Therefore, results of toxicological profiles (hazard) assessment achieved with NC7000™ cannot be extrapolated for other multiwall carbon nanotubes.

Read more Read less

Depending on the manufacturing parameters and processes, a large variety of multiwall carbon nanotubes structures can be produced. Those structures differ in the following parameters:

  1. Size and shape: Length, diameter, state of aggregates/agglomerates, number of walls, flexibility…
  2. Surface chemistry: functionnalization, capped or uncapped…
  3. Purity level: metallic contaminants, molecules adsorbed onto the particle…

Concerns have been raised about a similarity between MWCNTs and asbestos. MWCNTs form a large family of products differing in terms of structure, length, shape, diameter, state of agglomeration.

Figure 5 illustrates the variety of multiwall carbon nanotubes and compares them to asbestos. Asbestos fibers are very sharp long fibers. Long and straight MWCNTs look like asbestos and has raised health questions (Mitsui MWNT-7). However, a vast majority of commercial MWCNTS are curvy/curled, entangled and short and do not show asbestos like forms. In fact NC7000 and hyperion fibrils are representative of this class of not-asbestos like materials.

hse-4-variety-of-multiwall-carbon-nanotubes

Figure 5. Variety of multiwall carbon nanotubes structures.  NC7000™ MWCNT agglomerates, Hyperion fibrils MWCNT agglomerates, Mitsui MWCNT-7 MWCNT and Asbestos.

In conclusion, multiwall carbon nanotubes are extremely various materials and their toxicological profiles (hazard) have to be assessed on case by case basis. Therefore, results of toxicological profiles (hazard) assessment achieved with NC7000™ cannot be extrapolated for other multiwall carbon nanotubes.